© istockphoto.com/Dilen_ua
Erscheinung:15.09.2020 | Topic Recovery/resolution No resolution without relevant data
If a bank faces an imminent risk of resolution, it must be clear how things stand with its assets and liabilities. The draft new circular, the MaValuation, aims to show institutions what they must do now to be able to quickly provide the information required for a valuation in the event of a crisis.
An institution in distress must be able to provide the resolution authority with data and information relevant to the valuation for purposes of resolution. BaFin addresses this principle in its draft circular “Minimum requirements for information systems to provide information for valuations in the context of resolution” (MaValuation) (Mindestanforderungen an Informationssysteme zur Bereitstellung von Informationen für Bewertungen im Rahmen einer Abwicklung – MaBewertung).
An essential element of resolution is that a valuer – i.e. an external valuation company or, in the case of a preliminary valuation, the resolution authority, if necessary – must assess the assets and liabilities of the bank concerned. In particular, the valuation is used by the resolution authority to assess whether the bank is failing or likely to fail and what action it will need to take in the event of resolution.
To be able to make a sound valuation of assets and liabilities, the external valuer – or BaFin, as the resolution authority – relies on the bank to provide the relevant data and information prior to the resolution weekend. To be able to provide the necessary information quickly in the event of a crisis, the bank needs to make the appropriate arrangements in advance. The resolution authority supports the bank in these tasks by laying down requirements that are as specific as possible regarding the type of data and information necessary. BaFin is now setting out its requirements in the new circular.
Types of valuation
There are three distinct types of valuation. All three are designed to assist in answering key questions regarding resolution:
Valuation 1: Are the conditions for resolution met?
The resolution authority uses Valuation 1 to determine whether the conditions for resolution are met. To this end, the external valuer or the authority itself must carry out a fair and realistic valuation of the assets and liabilities. The main objective is to determine whether the institution’s assets exceed the value of its liabilities and whether it still meets the regulatory capital requirements.
Valuation 2: How should the resolution authority best implement the resolution?
Valuation 2 serves in particular to give the resolution authority a basis on which to decide which resolution strategy to use and how to implement it. The extent to which the resolution authority writes down or converts the bank’s relevant capital instruments and, if necessary, its liabilities is determined in this context. Valuation 2 is based on fair, prudent and realistic assumptions and assesses different scenarios. In contrast to Valuation 1, Valuation 2 is based on economic values and not on accounting or prudential values.
Valuation 3: Would insolvency have put shareholders/creditors in a better position?
This is a hypothetical insolvency comparison: Valuation 3 verifies whether the bank’s shareholders and creditors are at least as well off as a result of the resolution action as they would be under normal insolvency proceedings (see info box). This is a key safeguard in resolution (No-Creditor-Worse-Off test).
At a glance
:Legal bases for the valuation
Article 20(1) of the Single Resolution Mechanism Regulation (SRM Regulation) and section 69 (1) of the German Recovery and Resolution Act (Sanierungs- und Abwicklungsgesetz – SAG) require the assets and liabilities of the institution or group to be valued prior to resolution. In addition, once resolution has been completed, Article 20(16) of the SRM Regulation and section 146 (1) of the SAG require an independent valuer to examine the impact of the resolution on shareholders and creditors as compared to normal insolvency proceedings.
Preliminary and final valuation
Before the resolution authority can apply resolution measures to a bank, an external valuer must, in principle, have carried out a final valuation of the bank. If this is not possible, for example due to time constraints, Valuations 1 and 2 may also only be of a provisional nature. On the other hand, Valuation 3 must always be final and be carried out post-resolution.
Where preliminary valuations have been used as the basis for resolution, the resolution authority must have a final valuation carried out by an independent valuer after resolution.
BaFin’s two-step approach
Based on specifications requirements issued by the European Banking Authority (EBA), BaFin has opted for a two-step approach in the MaValuation to enable less significant institutions under national supervision to act as efficiently and effectively as possible in providing data and information relevant to the valuation, in line with the principle of proportionality (see info box “MaValuation target group”).
Step I is essentially based on the bank’s pre-existing internal and external standard reports as well as other key documents, such as its business plan. In step II, BaFin will require a concrete data model that incorporates data for the valuation required for resolution.
The subject matter of the new circular is currently limited to step I. BaFin will be specifying step II at a later stage, taking into account the fact that the EBA and the Single Resolution Board (SRB) have published a handbook/framework and that specific data requirements have already been developed. BaFin will also be drawing on the discussions being conducted with the banks.
The advantages of the two-step model are that it first establishes the initial capacity to act of the parties involved and then addresses the complex challenges of step II in dialogue with the institutions. This includes data points as well as delivery channels and formats. What is more: experience gained by the SRB can flow directly into the conceptual design of a national data model.
At a glance:MaValuation target group
In principle, the MaValuation are addressed to all institutions within the meaning of section 2 (1) of the SAG and to the entities referred to in section 1 (3) of the SAG in the Federal Republic of Germany that do not fall within the remit of the SRB as the resolution authority within the meaning of Article 7(2) of the SRM Regulation. The relevance of the MaValuation to an institution or entity is assessed by BaFin in its resolution planning with regard to whether the institution requires a potential resolution scenario or an insolvency scenario. As long as BaFin has not informed the institution otherwise, the institution may assume that all the information required for the purposes of the MaValuation is not necessary for the time being and that the institution is therefore not required to have the related processes and systems in place or to provide information in this regard.
Banks under the SRB’s direct responsibility will receive requirements from the SRB that have been developed in cooperation with BaFin.
Step I information requirements
Banks must be able to provide step I information in a specific structure to BaFin or to an external valuer in a virtual data room within 24 hours. They must submit at least the internal and external standard reports listed in the MaValuation, as well as other documents. Details regarding file formats and contents and regarding the data structure are discussed and agreed by BaFin and the banks as part of resolution planning. It must also be possible for the institution and BaFin to upload additional data and information at short notice.
Outlook
BaFin issued the draft MaValuation for public consultation from early September to 2 October 2020. It will subsequently publish the final version, including step I. Step II will encompass detailed data requirements along with a detailed data model, in compliance with EBA and SRB requirements. To this end, BaFin will be approaching the institutions in 2021.
Recommended links
EBA Handbook on Valuation for Purposes of Resolution
The German Recovery and Resolution Act (SAG) (only available in German)
Authors
Dr. Mehtap Ölger
Dr. Johannes Schneider
Marcus Schumacher
Dr. Christian Nowak
BaFin Resolution Measures and Methodology Directorate
Please note
This article reflects the situation at the time of publication and will not be updated subsequently. Please take note of the Standard Terms and Conditions of Use.