BaFin - Navigation & Service

Topic Anti-money laundering Amended version of the Money Laundering Act

Article from BaFin's 2017 annual report

The Act Implementing the Fourth EU Anti-Money Laundering Directive1, Interpreting the EU Funds Transfers Regulation and Reorganising the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) (Gesetz zur Umsetzung der Vierten EU-Geldwäscherichtlinie, zur Ausführung der EU-Geldtransferverordnung und zur Neuorganisation der Zentralstelle für Finanztransaktionsuntersuchungen) of 23 June 20172 entered into force on 26 June 2017 (see info box "BaFin involved in Level 3 measures"). The Act revised the Money Laundering Act of 2008. It is intended to prevent and combat money laundering and terrorist financing more effectively in Germany.

BaFin involved in Level 3 measures

The Fourth Money Laundering Directive and the Funds Transfer Regulation set the three European Supervisory Authorities, EBA, ESMA and EIOPA, a number of tasks to develop Level 3 measures. The drafts in this process are primarily prepared by the Sub-Committee on Anti Money Laundering (AMLC) of the Joint Committee of the three ESAs. Measures developed by members of the AMLC in 2017 included the guidelines on the risk factors3 and on the application of the Funds Transfers Regulation4 as well as the Joint Opinion on the risks of money laundering and terrorist financing affecting the EU’s financial sector.5 BaFin played a leading role in this process.

Electronic transparency register

The Act created the conditions for a central electronic transparency register. This register went live on 1 October 2017, creating and facilitating access to a record of the beneficial owners of corporations, partnerships und trusts that are active on the financial market. It is intended to increase the transparency of these legal entities and make it more difficult to abuse companies and trusts for the purposes of money laundering or terrorist financing. The register also makes use of information on equity investments stored in existing registers, such as the commercial register or the register of associations (section 22 (1) of the Money Laundering Act).

The register may be accessed by the Financial Intelligence Unit as well as supervisory authorities and law enforcement agencies. Companies and persons that are obliged entities within the meaning of the Money Laundering Act also have access – in fulfilment of their due diligence obligations under money laundering law. Even other individuals and organisations that demonstrate to the entity keeping the register that they have a legitimate interest may view the register.

Risk-based approach and group-wide obligations

The amended Money Laundering Act is based on a strong risk-based approach, under which all obliged entities as defined by the Act have to determine both their own risks and group-wide risks if they have subordinated companies in Germany or abroad. This enables not only the companies themselves, but also supervisory authorities to deploy their resources efficiently.

Administrative fines and sanctions

Serious, repeated or systematic violations of the Money Laundering Act may now be punished with an administrative fine of up to €1 million. In such cases, certain obliged entities that are legal persons or associations of individuals may be fined up to €5 million.

Moreover, the Act gives the competent authorities additional tools, including the option to temporarily prohibit the persons responsible for the violations from exercising management duties at an obliged entity.

  1. 1 Directive 2015/849/EU, OJ EU L 141/73.
  2. 2 Federal Law Gazette I 2017, page 1822.
  3. 3 Joint Guidelines under Articles 17 and 18(4) of Directive (EU) 2015/849 on simplified and enhanced customer due diligence and the factors credit and financial institutions should consider when assessing the money laundering and terrorist financing risk associated with individual business relationships and occasional transactions.
  4. 4 Joint Guidelines under Article 25 of Regulation (EU) 2015/847 on the measures payment service providers should take to detect missing or incomplete information on the payer or the payee, and the procedures they should put in place to manage a transfer of funds lacking the required information.
  5. 5 Joint Opinion on the risks of money laundering and terrorist financing affecting the Union's financial sector.

Did you find this article helpful?

We appreciate your feedback

Your feedback helps us to continuously improve the website and to keep it up to date. If you have any questions and would like us to contact you, please use our contact form. Please send any disclosures about actual or suspected violations of supervisory provisions to our contact point for whistleblowers.

We appreciate your feedback

* Mandatory field

Publications on this topic

Fol­low­ing the mon­ey

Human trafficking is a global crime – and it is as brutal as it is profitable. The financial industry has a key role to play in the fight against it. Financial institutions can help expose these criminal networks. By Birgit Rodolphe, Chief Executive Director of Resolution and Prevention of Money Laundering, BaFin

BaFin calls on in­sur­ers to im­ple­ment more con­trol mea­sures

(BaFinJournal) How does the Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin) monitor insurance undertakings’ efforts to prevent money laundering and terrorist financing? Carsten Sperl is responsible for this task at BaFin. In this interview, he provides insight into the work of BaFin’s anti-money laundering supervision units and current challenges in this field.

Com­bat­ing mon­ey laun­der­ing: “There is still some way to go”

On the whole, companies in the financial industry have made progress in the area of money laundering prevention in recent years. But in BaFin’s view, further improvement is needed.
Commentary by Birgit Rodolphe, Chief Executive Director of Resolution and Prevention of Money Laundering at BaFin.

All documents