BaFin - Navigation & Service

Stand:updated on 01.01.2016 | Topic Solvency Solvency I

The adoption of the first non-life insurance Directive (Directive 73/239/EEC) in 1973 and of the first life assurance Directive (Directive 79/267/EEC) six years later were the first steps towards harmonisation of insurance supervision in Europe. Implementation of the Directives resulted in harmonised solvency requirements in the EU Member States. The supervisory regime Solvency I was perfected by the second and third Directives (Directives 88/357/EEC, 90/619/EEC, 92/49/EEC and 92/96/EEC), which inter alia implemented the freedom to provide services in the insurance sector.

Work aimed at improving and providing a new focus for the existing EU solvency rules began at the European level in the 1990s. The European solvency rules for instance underwent a comparative examination by a Working Group led by former president of the Federal Insurance Supervisory Office (Bundesaufsichtsamt für das Versicherungswesen – BAV), Dr Helmut Müller. In its final report (the Müller Report), the Working Group stated that the European solvency rules had essentially stood the test of time. The result of the examination also showed, however, that the existing provisions on own funds did not adequately account for all risks to which an insurer is exposed. Comprehensive reform of the own funds provisions was therefore decided. However, as a result of the complexity of the subject matter, only the most urgent changes to Solvency I were implemented initially, with only the life assurance Directive (Directive 2002/83/EC) and the Directive regarding the solvency margin requirements for non-life insurance undertakings (Directive 2002/13/EC) adopted; the provisions of the first to third life assurance Directives which continued to apply were incorporated into the life assurance Directive. These Directives were transposed into national law through the German Act implementing regulatory provisions on the reorganisation and winding-up of insurance undertakings and credit institutions (Gesetz zur Umsetzung aufsichtsrechtlicher Bestimmungen zur Sanierung und Liquidation von Versicherungsunternehmen und Kreditinstituten - KredSanG) of 10 December 2003 (Federal Law Gazette I 2003, p. 2478). However, both Directives only represented a transitional solution towards a new risk-based supervisory system. The fundamental reform of the solvency rules for insurers remained the preserve of the supervisory regime Solvency II.

The Solvency I rules, however, remain applicable to undertakings to which Solvency II does not apply (small insurance undertakings, institutions for occupational retirement provision and death benefit funds). The core elements of Solvency I are included in sections 213 ff. of the Insurance Supervision Act (Versicherungsaufsichtsgesetz – VAG) as well as in the Capital Resources Regulation (Kapitalausstattungsverordnung – KapAusstV), the Investment Regulation (Anlageverordnung – AnlV) and the Regulation on the Supervision of Pensionsfonds (Pensionsfonds-Aufsichtsverordnung – PFAV).

Additional information

Did you find this article helpful?

We appreciate your feedback

Your feedback helps us to continuously improve the website and to keep it up to date. If you have any questions and would like us to contact you, please use our contact form. Please send any disclosures about actual or suspected violations of supervisory provisions to our contact point for whistleblowers.

We appreciate your feedback

* Mandatory field

Publications on this topic

De­ferred tax­es: In­sur­ers must pass a post-stress recog­ni­tion test – a dou­ble chal­lenge

Deferred taxes can mitigate own funds losses – specifically if they change in a stress scenario. If this results in deferred tax assets, insurers must pass a post-stress recognition test. And this is no simple task, as BaFin has established.

De­ferred tax as­sets re­quire recog­ni­tion test

Insurers must include deferred taxes in their Solvency II balance sheets, and they are required to provide evidence to justify the recognition of deferred tax assets. But, as BaFin has established, they are not always able to do this.

Well-found­ed, not ar­ti­fi­cial­ly con­struct­ed

Some insurers can only meet the solvency requirements under Solvency II with the help of transitional measures. On 1 January 2032 at the latest they must be able to do it alone. They document their progress towards this goal by submitting forecast calculations to the supervisory authority. Now BaFin is specifying uniform assumptions for the development of risk-free interest rates.

Re­port­ing of vari­a­tion anal­y­sis tem­plates

An initial review by BaFin shows that the Solvency II own funds of insurers are increasing and that the undertakings can provide conclusive explanations for most of the variations in own funds.

Sol­ven­cy II: Qual­i­ty progress in sol­ven­cy and fi­nan­cial re­port­ing

Insurance undertakings subject to Solvency II had to publish a Solvency and Financial Condition Report (SFCR) for the second time this year. A random survey on the quality of the reports confirmed BaFin's expectation that more experience with disclosure would have a positive effect on the quality of the SFCRs.

All documents